powered by

Latest News

Smile for the camera – or else

RSS Feed Submit a blog post

Page last updated: 5th Feb 2010 - 02:34 PM

Manchester Airport has introduced compulsory full-body scanning for ‘certain passengers’ in a bid to control the flow of dangerous terrorists onto British planes. Bosses have warned that refusal is not an option for anybody who wishes to fly.

The ‘naked scanner’ is not a popular piece of equipment. Critics have noted that the machine produces imagery that violates child pornography laws, and an attempt to make under-eighteens exempt from the scan was recently thrown out by the Government.

Further complaints include the sensitivity of the hardware – remarkably low, considering the hi-tech nature of global terrorism. The scanner cannot detect liquids or chemicals, both of which are used in homemade bombs.

Security staff seized a suitcase of white powder at Manchester last week, prompting the question – would a scanner have been able to detect the mysterious substance, and potentially save the lives of hundreds of travellers? Many experts say no.

The issue that continues to bother the cabinet concerns the identity of the passengers selected for full-body scanning. Civil rights campaigners fear that people from the Middle East and Africa could be unfairly targeted as potential terrorists, just because of their religion, or the way that they choose to dress.

Despite the accusations, the Government sees selective screening or ‘racial profiling’ as a very real alternative to traditional airport security measures. People who refuse to be scanned, due to modesty, for example, will be treated as potentially dangerous, and will be turned away from flights.

Heathrow and Birmingham airports join Manchester as pioneers of full-body scanning. The former has also begun compulsory screening, whilst the latter is due to receive a big parcel of scanners over the coming month.

Related Links

Trouble, as Mysterious Powder is Seized

Heathrow Unveils ‘Strip-Search’ Scanner

Comments - 6


1. mr f

21st Feb 2010 - 07:25 AM

if you have nothing to hide why not my safety comes first i don`t care what they see

Report Comment

2. Ian Archibald

17th Mar 2010 - 06:34 PM

I will be flighing out of Manchester Airport later this year to travel to Turkey on holiday with a party of 7 and we all feel the same way, if it means that we are going to be safer flying by going through the full body scanners then none of us has a problem with this. the safer you make flying the better as far as I am concerned.

Report Comment

3. huzz-bin-farteen

27th Mar 2010 - 03:47 PM

if they are only scanning muslims, i dont like it but if they are scanning random people it is fine

Report Comment

4. Robert Payne

7th Apr 2010 - 07:08 PM

What a load of baloney. The opening sentence, with the phrase, "...control the flow of dangerous terrorists..." says it all. Hyped-up tosh to keep us all scared - the real irony is that the system would not have detected the explosive underpants! Added to that, the underpants bomber was already known about - his father had even contacted the authorities about him! - yet still he was allowed to fly.

While I am all for reasonable security measures, I feel that the industry is taking it to ever-more ridiculous extremes.

Report Comment

5. michaeljames matthews

15th Apr 2010 - 08:49 AM

i totally agree with the full body scan. security should a high priority people should realise its for their own protection.

Report Comment

6. Colin Smith

28th Apr 2010 - 05:59 PM

I wholeheartedly agree with each comment published. We travel frequently to India, and it is very reassuring to know that there is not going to be
some idiot on the plane wanting to blow him or herself up and take everyone else with them.As
your first comment says, safety for all MUST come first.

Report Comment